AI in Translation Education: Benefits and Risks

الذكاء الاصطناعي في تعليم الترجمة: الفوائد والمخاطر

Authors

  • Nabila El Hadj Said Naama University Engineering Training and Projects Design Laboratory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33705/1111-019-001-005

Keywords:

AI tools, Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, DeepL, Google Translate

Abstract

Artificial intelligence nowadays dominates various fields especially education. The integration of AI tools such as Google Translate, DeepL, and ChatGPT in the educational sector has revolutionized learning and teaching. AI has transformed traditional classes into digitally enhanced learning contexts through instant information access and interactive engaging learning experiences. However, there are some challenges and shortcomings in integrating AI in education in general and universities in particular. This study aims to explore the influence and challenges of AI tools in translation classes of Naama university. Findings reveal that these tools serve as significant resources in refining translation efficiency.

References

 Bell, R. T. (1991). Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. London: Longman.

 Bhatt, C. K. (2021). The state of the art of deep. learning models in medical science and their challenges, 27(4), 599–613. doi:https://doi.org/DOI:10.1007/s00530-020-00694

 Crystal, D. (1991). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

 Dergaa, I. C. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2023.125623

 Hua, H. &. (2024). Investigating generative AI models and detection techniques: impacts of tokenization and dataset size on identification of AI-generated text. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1469197

 Hutchins, J. (1995). MACHINE TRANSLATION: A BRIEF HISTORY. In Concise history of the language sciences: from the Sumerians to the cognitivists. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

 Kramar, N. B. (2024). Ukrainian Phd Students’ Attitudes Toward Ai Language Processing Tools in the Context of English for Academic Purposes. Advanced Education, 12(24), 41–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.305061

 Li, A. W. (2024). Unpacking an online peer-mediated and self-reflective revision process in second-language persuasive writing. Reading and Writing, 37(6), 1545–1573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10466-8

 Mohammad, T. N. (2024). Examining EFL Students ’ Motivation Level in Using QuillBot to Improve Paraphrasing Skills. 4(1), 501–510.

 Rodríguez-Rubio, S. (2024). an Analysis of Google Translate and Deepl Translation of Source Text Typographical Errors in the Economic and Legal Fields. Revista de Llengua i Dret, 81, 88–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.58992/rld.i81.2024.4188

 Suhardiman, S. M. (2024). Using the Buana Online Course web-based mobile application to improve English for specific purpose engineering courses. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 13(3), 449–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v13i3.5189

 Tai, T. Y. (2020). The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1841801

 Yusuf, R. &. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Language Translation and Cross Cultural Communication. MJSSH, 9(4), 245–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/379

معالم العدد 25

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

El Hadj Said , N. (2026). AI in Translation Education: Benefits and Risks: الذكاء الاصطناعي في تعليم الترجمة: الفوائد والمخاطر. Maalim , 19(01), 124–111. https://doi.org/10.33705/1111-019-001-005

Issue

Section

المقالات