Critical Review of Translation Quality Assessment Models: A New Taxonomy‎

1) AL-QINAI, J. (2000). Translation Quality Assessment. Strategies, Parametres and Procedures. Meta, 45(3), 497–519. doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/001878ar

2) ANGELELLI, C. V., & JACOBSON, H. E. (2009). Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies: A call for dialogue between research and practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

3) BAKER, M. (1992). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London and New York: Routledge.

4) BELL, R. T., & CANDLIN, C. (1991). Translation and Translating. Theory and Practice. (Coll. Applied Linguistics and Language Study ed.). Londres/New York: Longman.

5) BENSOUSSAN, M., & ROSENHOUSE, J. (1990). Evaluating Student Translations By Discourse Analysis. Babel 36:2, 36(2), 65-84. doi:10.1075/babel.36.2.02ben

6) BOWKER, L. (2000). A Corpus-Based Approach to Evaluating Student Translations. Translator: Studies in ‎Intercultural Communication, 6(2), 183-210. doi:10.1080/13556509.2000.10799065‎

7) BRUNETTE, L. (2000). Towards a Terminology for Translation Quality Assessment: A Comparison of TQA ‎Practices. Translator: Special Issue on Evaluation and Translation, 6(2), 169-182. doi:10.1080/13556509.2000.10799064

8) CAMPBELL, S., & HALE, S. (2003). Translation and Interpreting Assessment in the Context of Educational Measurement. In G. ANDERMAN , & M. ROGERS, Translation Today: Trends and Perspectives. Clevedon, ‎UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

9) CATFORD, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics (1 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10) DANCETTE, J. (1992, Septembre). Modèles sémantique et propositionnel de l’analyse de la fidélité en traduction. Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Translators' Journal, 37(3), 440-449. doi:DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/002450ar

11) DELISLE, J. (1980). L' analyse du discours comme méthode de traduction (éd. 1). Editions de l'Université d'Ottawa.

12) DOLLERUP, C. (1994). Systematic Feedback in Teaching Translation. ‎. In C. DOLLERUP, & A. LINDEGAARD, Teaching Translation and Interpreting 2: Insights, Aims, Vision. Papers from the Second ‎Language International Conference Elsinore, Denmark 4 - 6 June 1993 (pp. 121-132). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

13) EMT Expert Group. (2009). Competences for professional translators, experts in multilingual and multimedia communication. Retrieved 11 4, 2025, from

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/translation/programmes/emt/key_documents/emt_competences_translators_en.pdf

14) EVEN-ZOHAR, I. (1978). The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem: New ‎Perspectives in Literary Studies. In J. S. HOLMES, J. LAMBERT, & R. VAN DEN BROECK, Literature and Translation (pp. 117–127). Leuven: Acco.

15) EVEN-ZOHAR, I. (1990, Spring). Polysystem Studies. Poetics Today: Polysystem Studies. International Journal for Theory ‎and Analysis of Literature and Communication, 11(1), 1-268.

16) FARAHZAD, F. (1992). Testing Achievement in Translation Classes‎. In C. DOLLERUP, & A. LODDEGAARD, Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent, Experience. Papers from the First Language International Conference, Elsinore, Denmark, 31 May-2 June 1991 (pp. 271-278). Amsterdan/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/z.56.41far

17) GOUADEC, D. (1981). Paramètres de l’évaluation des traductions. Meta: journal des traducteurs / Meta: ‎Translators' Journal, 26(2), 99-116. doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/002949ar

18) HALLIDAY, M. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Beijing and London: Foreign Language Teaching and Researching Press; Edward Arnold (Publishers) Limited.

19) HATIM, B., & MASON, I. (1990). Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.

20) HATIM, B., & MASON, I. (1997). The Translator as Communicator. NY & London: Routledge.

21) HERMANS, T. (1999). Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System-oriented Approaches Explained (1 ed.). Manchester: St Jerome Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315760469

22) HOLMES, J. S. (1972/2008). The Name and Nature of Translation Studies. In J. MUNDAY, Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Application (2 ed., pp. 9–11). London ‎& NY: Routledge‎.

23) HOLZ-MANTTARI, J. (1984). Translatorisches Handeln: Theorie und Methode (Translational Action: Theory and ‎Method ed.). Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.

24) HÖNIG, H. (1998). Positions, Power and Practice: Functionalist Approaches and Translation Quality. In C. SCHÄFFNER, Translation and Quality (pp. 6-34). Clevedon, Philadelphia, Toronto, Sydney, Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

25) HOUSE, J. (1977). A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.

26) HOUSE, J. (1997). Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Narr.

27) HOUSE, J. (2006). Covert Translation, Language Contact, Variation and Change. SYNAPS, 19, 25-47.

28) INES, P. R. (2009). Evaluating the process and not just the product when using corpora in translator ‎education. In A. BEEBY, P. INES, & P. SANCHEZ-GIJON, Corpus Use and Translating : Corpus Use for Learning to Translate and Learning Corpus Use ‎to Translate (Benjamins Translation Library ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

29) JAKOBSON, R. (1959). On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In R. A. BROWER, On Translation (pp. 232-239). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

30) JIMENEZ-CRESPO, M. A. (2011). From Many One: Novel Approaches to Translation Quality in a Social Network Era. ‎Linguistica Antverpiensia, ‎New Series, 10.

31) KUSSMAUL, P. (1995). Training the Translator (Benjamins Translation Library ed., Vol. 10). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

32) LAROSE, R. (1998). Méthodologie de l'évaluation des traductions. Meta : journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators' Journal, 43(2), 163-186. doi:10.7202/003410ar

33) LAUSCHER, S. (2000). Translation Quality Assessment: Where can Theory and Practice Meet? The Translator, 6(2), 149-168 . doi:10.1080/13556509.2000.10799063‎

34) MUNDAY, J. (2008). Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. London & NY: Routledge‎.

35) NEUBERT, A., & SHREVE, G. M. (1992). Translation as Text (Tanslation Studies Series ed., Vol. 1). Kent: Kent State University Press.

36) NEWMARK, P. (1981). Approaches to Translation. Oxford: Pergamon.

37) NEWMARK, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York and London: Prentice Hall.

38) NEWMARK, P. (1991). About Translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters‎.

39) NIDA, E. A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill. Retrieved 12 9, 2014, from http://www.bible-researcher.com/nida1.html

40) NIDA, E. A. (1991). ‎Theories of Translation. TTR : traduction, terminologie, rédaction, 4(1), 19-32. Retrieved from ‎http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037079ar

41) NORD, C. (1997). Translating as a Purposeful Activity. Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester‎: St. ‎Jerome.

42) O’BRIEN, S. (2012, January). Towards a Dynamic Quality Evaluation Model for Translation. The Journal of ‎Specialised Translation, 17(A), 55-77. doi:10.26034/cm.jostrans.2012.459

43) PACTE Group. (2009). Results Of The Validation Of The Pacte Translation Competence Model: Acceptability And Decision Making. Across Languages and Cultures, 10(2), 207–230. doi:10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.3

44) PANOU, D. (2013, January). Equivalence in Translation Theories: A Critical Evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 1-6. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.1.1-6

45) PÖCHHACKER, F. (2004). Introducing Interpreting Studies. London and New York: Routledge.

46) PYM, A. (2004). The Moving Text: Localization, Translation, and Distribution (Benjamins Translation Library ed., Vol. 49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

47) PYM, A. (2010). Exploring Translation Theories (1 ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

48) REISS, K. (2000). Translation Criticism – The Potentials & Limitations: Categories and Criteria for ‎Translation Quality Assessment. (E. F. RHODES, Trans.) Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

49) REISS, K., & VERMEER, H. J. (1984/2010). Grubdlegung einer Allgemeinen Translationstheorie. [Groundwork for a General Theory ‎of Translation] ‎. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag/De Gruyter Brill. doi:‎https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111351919‎

50) RICOEUR , P. (2004). Sur la traduction. Paris: Bayard.

51) ROBERTS, R. P. (1988). Towards a Typology of Translation. HIERONYMUS(1). Retrieved 1 1, 2014, from http://cvc.cervantes.es/lengua/hieronymus/pdf/01/01_069.pdf

52) SAGER, J. C. (1983). Quality and Standards. The Evaluation of Translations‎. In C. PICKEN, The Translator's Handbook (1 ed., pp. 121-128). London: Aslib and contributors.

53) SAINZ, M. J. (1994). Student-centred Correction of Translations. In C. DOLLERUP, & A. LINDEGAARD, Teaching Translation and Interpreting 2: Insights, Aims, Vision. Papers from the Second ‎Language International Conference Elsinore, Denmark 4 - 6 June 1993‎ (pp. 133-141). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

54) SCHÄFFNER, C. (1998). Translation and Quality (Vol. Current Issues in Language and Society). (P. C.-H. Dennis Ager, Ed.) Clevedon, Philadelphia, Toronto, Sydney, Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

55) SNELL‎, B., & CRAMPTON, P. (1983). Types of Translations. In C. PICKEN, The Translator's Handbook (1 ed., pp. 109-‎‎120). London: Aslib and contributors.

56) SNELL-HORNBY, M. (1988). Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John ‎Benjamins. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/z.38‎

57) SNELL-HORNBY, M. (2006). The Turns of Translation Studies. John Benjamins.

58) SPERBER, D., & WILSON, D. (1996). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2 ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.

59) TOROP, P. (2000). Towards the Semiotics of Translation. Semiotica, 128,(3/4), 597-609.

60) TOROP, P. (2003). Intersemiosis and Intersemiotic Translation. In S. PETRILLI , Translation ‎Translation (pp. 271-282). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

61) TOURY, G. (1995). Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond (Benjamins Translation Library ed., Vol. 4). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

62) TYMOCZKO, M. (2014). Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators (1 ed.). London: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759494‎

63) VINAY, J. P., & DARBELNET, J. (1958/1972). Stylistique Comparée du Francais et de l' Anglais: Méthode de Traduction (2 ed.). Paris: Marcel Didier. Retrieved 9 15, 2025, from

https://archive.org/details/VinayDarbelnetStylistiqueCompareDuFranaisEtDeLanglais/page/n7/mode/2up

64) WADDINGTON, C. (2003). A Positive Approach to the Assessment of Translation Errors. In R. MUÑOZ ‎MARTÍN , AIETI. Actas del I Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Ibérica de ‎Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación. Granada 12-14 February 2003 (AIETI ed., Vol. 2, pp. 409-426). Granada. Retrieved from http://www.aieti.eu/pubs/actas/I/AIETI_1_CW_Approach.pdf

65) WILLIAM, J., & CHESTERMAN, A. (2002). A Beginner’s Guide to Doing Research in Translation Studies. London, UK: St. Jerome ‎Publishing.

66) WILLIAMS, M. (2001). The Application of Argumentation Theory to Translation Quality Assessment. Meta: ‎Journal des traducteurs/Translators' Journal, 46(2), 326-344. ‎. doi:10.7202/004605ar