جولتي الكبرى في السيميوطيقا (السيميوطيقا من منظور الدّراسات الثقافيّة)
My big turn in semiotics. (Semiotics seen from cultural studies): translation to Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33705/1111-017-001-008Keywords:
Interdisciplinary, interpretation, semiology, semiotics, signAbstract
It is a scholarly biography which retraces Jean Baetens wanderings, from cultural studies to semiotics, while questioning a possible encounter between the two disciplines. For this, he introduces semiotics into cultural studies, on a theoretical level, on several levels. First of all, in the very definition of culture, the first and last object of cultural studies: culture is a sign, that is to say, not the thing itself but an object or structure that represents something for someone at a given time, and the mechanisms of this representation are examined primarily with the tools of semiotics. Culture and nature do not coincide, and culture does not reflect the world, it creates it, it is an active element in the articulation of a worldview, but without this action being deterministic or mechanical. Secondly in the challenges of analyzing culture as a sign: culture being made (created, produced, manufactured), it is also possible to undo it, that is to say to do it differently, and it is the objective of cultural studies.
References
1. ADORNO, Theodor W. (1980 [1951]), Minima Moralia, Réflexions sur la vie mutilée, Paris, Payot.
2. Corinne, Translation : traduire et adapter les Anciens. Paris :
3. ADORNO, Theodor W& HORKHEIMER, Max (1983 [1983]), Dialectique de la Raison, Paris, Gallimard, coll. Tel.
4. AGGER, Ben (1992), Cultural Studies as Critical as Critical Theory, London, Falmer Press.
5. BADIR Sémir (2007), « Pour une sémiotique indisciplinée », Les signes du monde.
6. Interculturalité et Globalisation, Actes du congrès de l’Association internationale de sémiotique, Lyon 2004 [en ligne depuis octobre 2007 : http : //jgalith.univ-lyon2.fr/Actes/Welcome.do].
7. BAETENS, Jan & POUCEL, Jean-Jacques (éds, 2009 & 2010), Constrained Writing, deux numéros spéciaux de Poetics Today, vol. 30-4 (2009) et 31-1 (2010).
8. BAL, Mieke (2002), Travelling Concepts in the Humanities : A Rough Guide, Toronto, Toronto University Press.
9. BARKER, Chris (2008), Cultural Studies. Theory &Practise, London, Sage.
10. BARTHES, Roland (1957), Mythologies, Paris, Seuil.
11. DARRAS, Bernard (2008), Images et sémiotique : sémiotique pragmatique et cognitive, Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne.
12. DERRIDA, Jacques (1967), De la grammatologie, Paris, Minuit.
13. DEWEY, John (2010 [1932]), L’art comme expérience, Paris, Folio.
14. DURING, Simon (2005), Cultural Studies. A Critical Introduction, London & New York, Routledge.
15. ECO, Umberto (1994), Les Limites de l’interprétation, Paris, Le livre de poche (Biblio Essais).
16. GROSSBERG, Lawrence (2010), Cultural Studies in the Future Tense, Chapel Hill, NC, Duke University Press.
17. Groupe µ (1993), Traité du signe visuel, Paris, Seuil.
18. HALL, Stuart (éd., 1997), Cultural Representations and Signifying Practises, London, Sage/ Open University.
19. KLINKENBERG, Jean-Marie (2009), Petites mythologies belges, Bruxelles, Les Impressions Nouvelles.
20. LEWIS, Jeff (2008), Cultural Studies. The Basics (2nd edition), London, Sage.
21. SHUSTERMAN, Richard (1992), L’art à l’état vif. La pensée pragmatiste et l’esthétique, Paris, Minuit.
22. WILLIAMS, Raymond (1958), Culture and Society, London, Chatto and Windus.
23. ZUNSHINE, Lisa (éd., 2010), Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, Chapel, Hill, NC, Duke University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nasr eldin binghanisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
